Gateway 3 QA evidence gap analysis (sample)

✓Construction QA

Gateway 3 · QA Evidence Gap Analysis

Higher-risk building · 19-storey student accommodation, 640 beds
G3-GA-01
Rev A
Data date: 20 Feb 2026
SAMPLE REPORT · Fictional project, names, dates and results for illustration only

1. Scope

Building19 storeys, 58m, purpose-built student accommodation
StatusHigher-risk building (Building Safety Act 2022)
Principal Contractor[Principal Contractor]
Target completionQ3 2026 · Gateway 3 application planned 10 weeks before
ReviewField View records, ITPs, test certificates, O&M drafts, sample site verification on L3, L9, L16
ReviewerPeter Mindaugas Kvilis MCIOB
12Safety-critical elements
71%Evidence complete
3Red elements
41Actions raised
Key finding: Evidence is strong for structure, sprinklers and smoke control. Fire stopping, cavity barriers and fire doors have gaps that can still be closed while areas are accessible. Waiting until commissioning would risk opening up finished work and delaying the application.

2. Evidence status by element

ElementEvidence requiredAvailableStatusComplete
Structural framePour records, cube results, engineer sign-offAll floorsGreen
Compartmentation wallsITPs, pre-close inspections, photos per wallL1–L14 onlyAmber
Fire stopping (penetrations)Per-penetration record, product data, installer certs~55% of penetrationsRed
Cavity barriers (façade)Location plan, install photos before closing, inspectionNo photos L10–L13Red
Façade systemFixing inspections, product certs, test evidenceComplete to L17Amber
Fire doorsetsCertification, install inspection, gap checksInstall checks 40%Red
SprinklersInstall, pressure tests, commissioning planTests to L18Green
Smoke controlInstall records, commissioning planComplete to dateGreen
Dry riserInstall, pressure testTest L1–L19Green
Fire alarm & detectionInstall, cause & effect, commissioningInstall 80%Amber
Firefighting liftInstall, test planIn progressAmber
As-built information (golden thread)Linked drawings, change log, O&MStructure agreed, partly populatedAmber

3. Priority actions

#ActionOwnerDuePriority
1Survey and record all open penetrations L10–L19 before ceiling close-up; one record per penetration in Field ViewFire stopping sub + QA27 MarHigh
2Cavity barriers L10–L13: intrusive sample inspection (min. 10 locations) to confirm installation; record findingsFaçade sub + QA13 MarHigh
3Fire doorsets: complete install inspections incl. gaps, hinges, seals; link certification to door scheduleJoinery sub + QA10 AprHigh
4Compartmentation L15–L19: pre-close inspections at hold points before boardingDrylining sub + QAOngoingMedium
5Golden thread: agree folder structure and naming; link each record to location and drawing revisionPrincipal Contractor20 MarMedium
6Fire alarm cause & effect sign-off with commissioning programmeM&E contractor24 AprMedium

4. Sample verification on site

FloorItems checkedMatched recordsComment
Level 324231 penetration sealed but no record → recorded
Level 924213 penetrations with no record; 1 incorrect product (NCR raised)
Level 161812Records not yet uploaded by subcontractor

5. Recommendation

Set a 12-week evidence recovery plan with weekly reporting against the actions above, and make closed-up areas conditional on a completed Field View record. Re-run this analysis at Rev B (target 22 May 2026) to confirm readiness for the Gateway 3 application.

Prepared byPeter Mindaugas Kvilis MCIOB
For[Principal Contractor] · Building Safety Manager
NoteQA evidence review only. Statutory sign-off rests with the Principal Contractor and the Building Safety Regulator.
Construction QA, a trading name of Sapper Ltd · Company no. 09462720 · info@constructionqa.co.uk · 07468 944 222Rev A

← All sample reports · Want this format on your project? Book a visit.